IJR NEWS – World Class Journalism

Submit your article and be heard

The most influential CEO’s in The United States

Chief Executive Officer of Center for a New Am... Chief Executive Officer of Center for a New American Security (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The most influential CEO’s in The United States

The most powerful CEOs in America

Justin Sullivan / Getty Images

CEO Mark Zuckerberg has 56.5 percent of the voting shares of Facebook.

By Douglas A. McIntyre, 24/7 Wall St.

Several CEOs and founders of well-known American companies have complete control over their companies. Through voting power, they control the boards and strategic decisions of these corporations. The best current example is Facebook, which will go public in a few weeks. Founder and CEOMark Zuckerberg owns enough of the voting shares in the company that his decisions cannot be overruled by outside shareholders or the board under most circumstances. Zuckerberg is also the most visible American CEO among a small group who have complete control of their companies and how long they will remain at their jobs.

The most powe

President Barack Obama and Warren Buffett in t... President Barack Obama and Warren Buffett in the Oval Office, July 14, 2010. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

rful CEOs fall into three categories. The first are founders who are currently CEOs. They may, by themselves, or with other founders, have voting control over their companies. Larry Page of Google is the best example of this. He started the Internet search engine with Sergey Brin. Together with Google’s chairman Eric Schmidt, who they hired, the three hold shares that have nearly two-thirds of the company’s voting rights.

24/7 Wall St.: The least powerful CEOs in America

The next category is founders who no longer have the majority of the vote in their companies, but who have been in charge successfully for so long that their job security is not in question. Jeff Bezos at Amazon.com is the best example of this group. He owns slightly less than 20 percent of the company that he started in 1994. This stake is greater than that of any othershareholder. But it is his status as founder and his tremendous success that ensure he will not be replaced unless he wishes to be.

The final category of powerful CEOs are relatives of founders. These CEOs inherited the voting rights, usually from their parents, and they use those rights to run the company for another generation. The best example of this is Brian Roberts of Comcast, whose father started the company. By almost any measure, Comcast has done well financially and in the stock market. Even if it did not, Roberts would have his job.

24/7 Wall St. reviewed the corporate structure, governance and voting rights of the 500 largest companies by market cap. Based on a review of company proxies, we identified those companies where the CEO had voting control of the company or was the company’s founder. We then limited the universe to those companies with market cap in excess of $30 billion.

24/7 Wall St.: America’s nine most damaged brands

1. Facebook

  • Name: Mark Zuckerberg (Age: 27)
  • Title: Founder, Chairman and Chief Executive
  • Shares: 36.1 percent of the Class A shares and 56.6 percent of the Class B shares

As the initial public offering of Facebook approaches, the company faces three major hurdles with investors. The first is the company’s worth. Estimates have pegged Facebook’s market cap once it begins to trade at $100 billion. It is unclear whether investors will support that price for a company that had only a little over $1 billion in revenue last quarter and earnings of $205 million. The second is whether it can continue to keep Google and other competitors at bay as it has done so successfully up until now. For example, Internet research firm Comscore released data late last year that showed the average U.S. Facebook user spent seven hours and 46 minutes on the site during August. That is nearly four times the time spent by visitors to Google during the same time frame. The last question is how much it matters that founder Mark Zuckerberg appears to run the company with only the most modest advice from his board. When Facebook bought the photosharing application company Instagram for $1 billion, several in the media reported that the board was not briefed about the transaction until it was well underway. Through direct and indirect control of class B stock, Zuckerberg has 56.5 percent of the voting shares of Facebook, making investors nearly powerless to affect changes in the social network company.

2. Google

  • Name: Larry Page (Age: 39)
  • Title: Founder and Chief Executive
  • Shares: 28.4 percent of all voting power among shareholders

Larry Page was the CEO of search giant Google from its founding in 1998 until 2001. He and co-founder Sergey Brin brought in Eric Schmidt to run the company as chief executive. Page took the job back last year. Among them, the three have 65.8 percent of the class B voting shares. Google’s proposed stock split would give the founders even more power. Page’s immediate challenge a little over a year into his second stint as CEO is to show that Google can expand sales beyond its traditional search business. So far, Page has not had much more success in sales diversification than Schmidt had. Google’s Android mobile operating system is now among the most widely distributed in the world, and by some measures is in first place. But Google has been unable to demonstrate how this distribution makes it money. In addition, several patent suits have been brought against Google about Android’s intellectual property ownership, which makes the sales bar for the business even higher. Investors are also concerned about the fast growth of Google’s staff, which has added rapidly to costs. Google had 33,077 full-time employees at the end of the first quarter.

24/7 Wall St.: America’s 10 Highest Paid CEOs (Which Are Worth It?)

3. Amazon.com

  • Name: Jeff Bezos (Age: 48)
  • Title: Founder, Chairman, and Chief Executive
  • Shares: 19.5 percent of all outstanding shares

At 48, Jeff Bezos is the grand old man of the American Internet. He founded Amazon in 1994, and the company has gone from a tiny online bookstore to the largest e-commerce business in the world. Amazon earned $130 million on sales of $13.18 billion in the last reported quarter. Bezos has increased Amazon products offerings over the years so that the company is a major force in consumer electronics, clothing, software, toys and even groceries. Bezos’s most widely regarded innovation is the e-reader business, driven by its Kindle hardware and an online library of tens of thousands of books. The Kindle and Kindle Fire tablet are leaders in the e-reader and tablet PC market. Amazon is one of the few companies that poses a threat to any of the Apple’s products. Amazon also has a large enterprise business line. Amazon Web Services offers clients e-commerce tools through the cloud. Companies that do not want to invest in their own server hardware, software and bandwidth can use the Amazon service as a turnkey solution.

4. Berkshire Hathaway

  • Name: Warren Buffett (Age: 81)
  • Title: Chairman and Chief Executive
  • Shares: 33.8% of Class B voting shares, also listed in proxy as a controlling person of the corporation

Warren Buffett is the grand old man of American investing. Buffett has been a board member of the company since 1965 and its chairman and chief executive officer since 1970. Berkshire filings to the SEC say that “Major investment decisions and all major capital allocation decisions are made by Warren E. Buffett, Chairman of the Board of Directors and CEO.” He has built Berkshire Hathaway into one of the largest conglomerates in the world, as well as into a holding company for stakes in a number of well-known companies. These include total ownership of GEICO Auto Insurance, International Dairy Queen and Benjamin Moore. Berkshire also has significant investments in IBM, American Express, Coca-Cola and Wells Fargo. Berkshire is one of the most valuable public corporations in the county with a market cap of more than $200 billion.

5. Oracle

  • Name: Larry Ellison (Age: 67)
  • Title: Founder and Chief Executive
  • Shares: 22.4% of company’s shares

Larry Ellison, who founded Oracle (ORCL) in 1977, has thrashed his competition in the global enterprise software industry, holding off challenges from Microsoft, SAP and a number of other companies. These companies would like to increase the part of their businesses that sell hardware and software to large businesses and governments. Ellison has made a number of shrewd buyouts, including Sun Microsystems, which increased Oracle’s business in Java software and the server market. The most powerful part of Oracle’s earnings engine is the license fees it charges its customers. The fees offer recurring revenue streams that can last for years. Not shy of exercising his control in the company, Ellison has rotated a number of people in and out of the number two position at Oracle. Its most recent president is disgraced former Hewlett-Packard CEO Mark Hurd. Ellison made a public statement about how foolish the HP board was to fire a talented executive, and then snatched him up within a matter of weeks. Ellison has several extremely expensive hobbies, including the support of an entry in the America’s Cup yacht race. His boat won the most recent competition.

Also Read: America’s Most (and Least Peaceful States)

6. Comcast

  • Name: Brian Roberts (Age: 52)
  • Title: Chief Executive, Chairman and son of founder
  • Shares: Owns or controls 100% of Class B voting shares

Brian Roberts, like a number of CEOs who control the voting shares of their companies, is the son of the founder. Ralph Roberts, who is 92, cobbled together a number of small cable companies as the industry grew from largely a rural and suburban business to one that serves large cities. Comcast, which was founded in Mississippi in 1967, now has 48.9 million video, high-speed Internet, and voice over IP customers. Comcast bought a controlling interest in NBC Universal from General Electric last year. The company is now only one of the largest distribution networks in the United States, but it is also one of the largest content producers because of NBC. The government struggled with potential “monopoly” problem when it approved the transaction. The cable industry used to be a de facto monopoly because cable companies controlled discrete regions of the country. Now, however, AT&T and Verizon have laid fiber in front of tens of millions of homes so that they can compete with cable companies in the broadband Internet and video markets. Comcast must also contend with improved technology for satellite TV, which makes these services more competitive with cable.

(Msnbc.com is a joint venture of Microsoft and Comcast’s NBC Universal unit.)

7. Groupon

  • Name: Andrew Mason (Age: 31)
  • Title: Chief Executive Officer and Cofounder
  • Shares: 41.7% of Class B voting shares

Groupon (GRPN) is widely considered the most poorly run of the Web 2.0 IPOs. The online coupon company has to restate earnings for its most recent quarter because of a “miscalculation” of its customer refunds. It has cut the original revenue statements by $14.3 million. The company admitted it has a “material weakness” in its financial reporting process, a tremendous warnings sign about the quality of a company’s management. This is not the first time Groupon had to restate its financials. It had to do so before its IPO as well because of SEC and potential investors challenged how it accounted for sales. Andrew Mason has been able to insulate himself from all of these catastrophes at least as far as his job security is concerned. Mason and two other cofounders, Executive Chairman Eric P. Lefkofsky and Bradley A. Keywell, own 100% of the voting shares. SEC filings directed to by the company to shareholders say this stock ownership “limit your ability to influence corporate matters.” What is at risk for Mason is his fortune. Groupon’s shares have dropped from a post-IPO high of $31.14 to just over $10 recently.

Also Read: Nine Countries Where Everyone Has a Job

8. LinkedIn

  • Name: Jeffrey Weiner (Age: 42)
  • Title: Chief Executive Officer
  • Shares: 5.9% of voting shares

LinkedIn has done a good job convincing Wall St. that its professional social network has strong longer term prospects. From a post-IPO low of $55.98, shares have risen to more than $108. LinkedIn’s 2011 revenue was $522 million, up from $243 million the year before. Net income attributable to common stockholders rose from $3 million to $12 million. Growth rates are not the only thing that shareholder likes about LinkedIn. The company makes money from its more than 150 million members in two ways. LinkedIn sells its products online but also has a sales force that sells and markets products directly to companies. The revenue between these two businesses is nearly equal, which gives LinkedIn a diversity of sales that other social networks like Twitter do not have. CEO Jeffrey Weiner benefits from his relationship with the company’s largest shareholder, Reid Hoffman. Hoffman owns 45.4% of Class B voting shares. SEC filings by LinkedIn call his holdings as having a “significant influence over the management and affairs of the company.” Hoffman is a serial entrepreneur who made a fortune as a senior executive at PayPal. He also sits on the board of online game company Zynga.

May 9, 2012 Posted by | Breaking News Headlines, Economic News, Everything Internet, Investment News, Political, U.S. Sports News | Leave a Comment

Dementia drug manufacturer to ordered to pay huge settlement

Abbott Laboratories to pay $1.5 billion over misbranding drug

From Terry Frieden, CNN Justice Producer

Washington (CNN) – Abbott Laboratories has pleaded guilty and agreed to pay $1.5 billion to resolve its criminal and civil liability arising from the company’s unlawful promotion of the prescription drug Depakote, the U.S. Justice Department said Monday.

The total — the second-largest payment ever by a drug company — includes a criminal fine of $700 million and civil settlements with the states and federal government totaling $800 million.

Abbott pleaded guilty to misbranding Depakote by promoting the drug to control agitation and aggression in patients with elderly dementia and to treat schizophrenia when neither use was approved by the Food and Drug Administration, the Justice Department said.

Abbott will be subject to court-supervised probation and reporting obligations for Abbott’s CEO and board of directors.

Under the law, a drug maker’s promotional activities must be limited to uses approved by the FDA. Promotion by the manufacturer for “off-label” uses renders a product misbranded.

In this case, Abbott pleaded guilty to misbranding Depakote by promoting the drug for off-label uses.

The company admitted that, from 1998 through 2006, it “maintained a specialized sales force trained to market Depakote in nursing homes for the control of agitation and aggression in elderly dementia patients, despite the absence of credible scientific evidence that Depakote was safe and effective for that use,” the Justice Department said in a news release.

“In addition, from 2001 through 2006, the company marketed Depakote in combination with atypical antipsychotic drugs to treat schizophrenia, even after its clinical trials failed to demonstrate that adding Depakote was any more effective than an atypical antipsychotic alone for that use.”

The FDA approved Depakote only for epileptic seizures, bipolar mania and the prevention of migraines.

In 1999, Abbott discontinued a trial of Depakote in the treatment of dementia due to adverse events that included drowsiness, dehydration and anorexia.

Abbott trained its sales force to promote the drug to health care providers and employees of nursing homes as better than antipsychotic drugs for controlling agitation and aggression in elderly dementia patients, the release said.

Abbott sales representatives touted the fact that Depakote was not subject to certain provisions of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987 and its regulations intended to prevent medications from being used unnecessarily in nursing homes, it added.

“Exploiting the fact that certain OBRA provisions did not yet apply to Depakote, Abbott sales representatives stated that by using Depakote, nursing homes could avoid the administrative burdens and costs of complying with OBRA,” the news release said.

The company wound up giving millions of dollars in rebates to pharmacists at long-term-care facilities that were based on increases in the use of the drug in nursing homes they serviced, the news release said.

“In addition to using its sales force to promote the drug to health care providers and employees of nursing homes, Abbott created programs and materials to train the pharmacy providers’ consultant pharmacists about the off-label use of Depakote to encourage them to recommend the drug for this unapproved use,” it added.

“Not only did Abbott engage in off-label promotion, but it targeted elderly dementia patients and downplayed the risks apparent from its own clinical studies,” said Acting Associate Attorney General Tony West. “As this criminal and civil resolution demonstrates, those who put profits ahead of patients will pay a hefty price.”

The company also admitted that, from 2001 through 2006, it marketed the drug to treat schizophrenia. Though the company paid for two studies of the use of Depakote to treat schizophrenia, neither met the goals established for the study, it said.

“When the second study failed to show a statistically significant treatment difference between antipsychotic drugs used in combination with Depakote and antipsychotic drugs alone, Abbott waited nearly two years to notify its own sales force about the study results and another two years to publish those results,” it said. During that time, the company continued to promote the drug for the treatment of schizophrenia.

Abbott pleaded guilty to a criminal misdemeanor for misbranding Depakote. Under the plea agreement, it will pay a criminal fine of $500 million, forfeit assets of $198.5 million, and submit to a term of probation for five years.

Under the civil settlement, Abbott agreed to pay $800 million to the federal government and to states that participate in the agreement to resolve claims that its practices caused false claims to be submitted to government health care programs.

The settlement covers allegations that Abbott paid health care professionals and long-term-care pharmacy providers to induce them to prescribe the drug.

The civil settlement resolves four lawsuits pending in federal court in the Western District of Virginia under the whistle-blower provisions of the False Claims Act. As part of the resolution, the whistle-blowers will receive $84 million from the federal share of the settlement amount.

In a statement posted on its website, Abbott said it had cooperated fully with the government during its investigation.

The company plans to separate into two publicly traded companies by the end of the year.

“We are pleased to resolve this matter and are confident we have the programs in place to satisfy the requirements of this settlement,” said Laura J. Schumacher, Abbott’s executive vice president and general counsel. “The company takes its responsibility to patients and health care providers seriously and has established robust compliance programs to ensure its marketing programs meet the needs of health care providers and legal requirements.”

May 7, 2012 Posted by | Breaking News Headlines, Everything Internet, Investment News, Latest U.S. News, Latest World News, Political, Science and Technology | , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment

Foreign policy changes upcoming for Francois

Early foreign policy tests await France’s Hollande

By Joe Sterling, CNN

Click to play
Europe’s election: Lessons for the U.S.?
(CNN) – The calm and cautious François Hollande, who dramatically wrested the French presidency from Nicolas Sarkozy on Sunday, faces immediate foreign policy challenges, analysts say.

Hollande strides onto the world stage with major events over upcoming days and weeks — the Group of Eight meeting at Camp David, Maryland, and the NATO summit this month and a G-20 meeting set for Mexico City, and a European Council meeting in Brussels, Belgium, in June.

French journalist and political analyst Agnès Poirer said Hollande must meet President Barack Obama in Washington on May 17. She said in a CNN commentary that the “two men have never met and Hollande is an unknown entity in the U.S.”

The rule of thumb about judging the effectiveness of a president after his or her first 100 days in office could be changed to the first “100 hours” in Hollande’s case, said Heather Conley, senior fellow and director of the Center for Strategic and International Studies’ Europe Program.

In a brief amount of time, Conley said, “We’re going to get important insights on French directions.”

 Hollande became France’s first Socialist president since François Mitterrand left office in 1995 as he swept to election victory over the incumbent Sarkozy, one of the most America-friendly French presidents in decades.

The result is likely to reverberate across economically hard-hit Europe. Hollande has been critical of the austerity policies central to European bailout deals for troubled economies there. But his leadership is expected to make an impact in Afghanistan as well as Turkey and the Middle East.

European markets quickly recovered from an earlier sell-off Monday following national elections in France as well as Greece that sparked concern about the future of planned austerity measures.

U.S. stocks were mixed Monday amid reignited concerns about Europe following the elections in France and Greece. The Dow Jones industrial average lost 32 points, or 0.2%, the S&P 500 shed 1 point, or 0.1%, while the Nasdaq composite rose 2 points, or 0.1%.

“A change in leadership brings uncertainty because you don’t know exactly what you’re getting into,” said Ryan Detrick, senior technical strategist at Schaeffer’s Investment Research.

“New leadership in France could cause investor jitters that reverberate through global financial markets.”

Stephen Flanagan, the Henry A. Kissinger chair in diplomacy and national security at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, underscored the sense of uncertainty. Hollande doesn’t have a “big foreign policy track record,” he said.

“Hollande has been mostly a party functionary,” he said.

Danielle Pletka and Gary J. Schmitt of the American Enterprise Institute wrote that Hollande’s “campaign stayed away from talking about foreign policy almost altogether.” Only four points of Hollande’s 60-point agenda “touch on foreign affairs,” they said.

“Contrary to those who believe Sarko was the George Bush of France (‘dragging’ Obama into Libya, taking a hard line on Iran’s nuclear program), and have hopes that the long-time head of the French Socialist Party will take a severe turn to the left, Hollande is likely to disappoint,” they said.

Flanagan doesn’t see Hollande as being anti-American or a “difficult ally.”

“I think he’s going to be a little bit more cautious and circumspect about international intervention,” Flanagan said.

With Sarkozy, the United States enjoyed support in its positions on Syria, Iran and Afghanistan. Sarkozy was a proponent of the NATO air campaign in Libya, but Flanagan said he’s “not sure Hollande would have led the charge into Libya.”

Pletka and Schmitt wrote Hollande hasn’t tried to “distance himself from his predecessor’s intervention in Libya or his relatively hawkish policies toward Syria and Iran.”

“The one policy change Hollande is specifically committed to (and which will be most noticed by conservatives in Washington) is his pledge to withdraw all French combat troops from Afghanistan by the end of the year,” they said, “This is not a radical departure from Sarkozy, who had already pledged to bring those troops home in 2013, a full year ahead of the alliance’s agreement to stay until 2014.”

During the campaign, Hollande also raised questions about Sarkozy’s decision in 2009 to place French troops under NATO command.

Hollande can expect NATO leaders to urge him to change or soften his position when he attends the NATO summit in Chicago this month where the focus will be on Afghanistan.

But if Hollande commits to disengaging troops without a reasonable transition, “it’ll make a very bad first impression with his NATO allies,” Flanagan said.

Flanagan said relations between Turkey and France have been tense because Sarkozy was “dead set” against Turkey becoming a member of the European Union. He said Turks also viewed Sarkozy as supportive of legislation making the denial of the Armenian genocide a crime, a stance they vehemently opposed. Hollande is expected to be a bit more open-minded on Turkey, Flanagan said.

Marc Pierini, a former European Union career diplomat, wrote in a commentary for the Carnegie Endowment for International Peacethat France also needs a “fresh start” in the Arab world.

“Hollande will now have to rebuild decent relations with largely unknown political partners — Islamists now dominate the political game in Egypt and Tunisia for example. He will also need to work with the Arab world more through the EU framework, rather than through a strictly bilateral one, which his predecessor preferred but did not work,” he said.

Pierini wrote that Hollande’s “strongest cards” are his “calm, polite demeanor” and the “legitimacy deriving from his victory.” Pletka and Schmitt wrote “the dry and cautious Hollande appears almost certain to pursue a dry and cautious presidency.”

May 7, 2012 Posted by | Breaking News Headlines, Everything Internet, Investment News, Latest World News, Political | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment

O.C. fraud ring officially charged

Three Orange County residents are charged with fraud in alleged real estate scheme

The trio are among six people accused of bilking $4.2 million from more than three dozen victims.

Three Orange County residents are among six people charged with fraud related to an alleged real estate flipping scheme that bilked at least $4.2 million from more than three dozen victims, prosecutors said.

All six were accused of promising investors title to bank-owned homes that they said could be easily resold for a profit, according to the U.S. attorney’s office in Los Angeles.

The scheme lasted from mid-2009 through mid-2010 and targeted victims through seminars held online and in Irvine, Costa Mesa, Florida and Texas, according to the indictment.

The houses, allegedly sold to victims for as much as $45,000, were pitched as coming with property management services and guaranteed rentals for the first three months, court documents said.

Instead, according to the indictment, the properties were uninhabitable, condemned, worthless and, in some cases, nonexistent.

The defendants paid less than $10,000 for each home, some of which came burdened by tax liens, fines and building code violations, unbeknown to victims, the indictment said.

Defendants include Sylvia Melkonian, 48, of Laguna Beach; Andrew Wardein, 38, of Irvine; and Craig Shults, 41, of Huntington Beach. Also named in the indictment were Paul LiCausi, 47, and Joseph Haymore, 31, of Florida, and Sheridan Snyder, 65, of Tennessee.

Shults’ attorney, James Riddet, said his client plans to plead not guilty. “My review of the facts indicates that he probably should not have been indicted,” Riddet said.

The indictment was handed down April 18 by a federal grand jury but released Tuesday.

Each defendant is charged with at least five counts of wire fraud and could face 100 years or more in federal prison if convicted.

May 4, 2012 Posted by | Breaking News Headlines, Everything Internet, Investment News, Latest U.S. News | , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment

Medicare fraud ring busted

100 charged in health care fraud bust

By Terry Frieden, CNN

Click to play
DOJ: 107 charged in Medicare fraud bust

Washington (CNN) – More than 100 people have been charged and an estimated $450 million in false billings uncovered by federal agents in a nationwide operation that authorities say is the largest bust in recent history.

Law enforcement sources say the charges were lodged in seven metropolitan areas, capping an investigation of several months into efforts to defraud Medicare, Medicaid and other federal health programs.

It is the largest of four such sweeps announced during the Obama administration.

Attorney General Eric Holder and Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius are expected to announce the operation Wednesday and emphasize their determination to combat phony billing practices in the health care industry.

May 2, 2012 Posted by | Breaking News Headlines, Economic News, Everything Internet, Investment News, Latest U.S. News | , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment

Is Microsoft still a competitor against rivals?

Microsoft’s master plan to beat Apple and Google

By David Goldman

The desktop (left), Xbox (middle) and Windows Phone (right) will soon share one common interface.Microsoft’s desktop (left), Xbox (middle) and Windows Phone (right) will soon share one common interface.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) — Microsoft is staging a comeback — and, unlikely as this sounds, it’s one Apple and Google should be worried about.

Microsoft’s recipe relies on three key ingredients: Windows, Windows Phone and Xbox. The secret sauce, which features a dash of Bing and SkyDrive, is still simmering. But Microsoft is nothing if not patient, and it thinks its trio of core consumer products will blend together in the next few years to form a major new ecosystem.

Here’s the big vision: Whether you’re using your TV, PC, tablet, phone, or almost any other device that comes along, you’ll be able to accomplish all the same tasks through all the same platform. The form factor will change, but the core experience won’t.

“People are starting to see the same look-and-feel across the three screens and the cloud,” says Craig Beilinson, director of Microsoft’s consumer marketing. “This is all going to get pretty blurry.”

It’s a vision shared by Apple (AAPL, Fortune 500) and Google (GOOG, Fortune 500), but their implementations are fundamentally different.

The linchpin of Microsoft’s plan is Windows 8, which is set to launch this fall. The new operating system features touchscreen integration and theinteractive tile-based “Metro” user interface, which debuted in late 2010 for Windows Phone 7 and made its way to Xbox last summer.

That lets Windows run — quite well, according to early reviews — on a host of new devices, including tablets, table tops, large touchscreen displays and convertible notebooks.

Microsoft is also baking cloud-based services like Windows Live, SkyDrive and Bing into all of its consumer products. Sign in on any device and you’ll have access to all of your content, apps, preferences and search history.

Apple and Google’s device ecosystems are more fragmented.

Apple says we’re in a “post-PC” world. Its solution puts mobile devices like the iPad and iPhone at the forefront, envisioning the PC as a wholly separate device and platform. Macs integrate with iOS devices, but there’s a clear schism in Apple’s world view: Mobile devices are for content consumption, Macs are for creation.

For example, it’s hard to build iPad apps on an actual iPad. To run Apple’s Xcode developer software, you need a Mac.

Google’s model focuses on the Web as the single platform of the future. It’s a device-agnostic approach, but it requires constant connectivity. Once you go offline, your connection to Google’s computing platform vanishes.

Right now, both are thrashing Microsoft in key markets. Microsoft has watched Apple race past it in media and tablets. Google captured search and the cloud, and both companies overtook Microsoft in smartphones. Meanwhile, sales of the PC — Microsoft’s bread and butter – have stalled.

That puts Microsoft in an unusual position. It’s the underdog.

Microsoft-turned-Google-turned-Microsoft engineer James Whittaker explained that phenomenon in a recent blog post about why he left his job as a head engineer on social network Google+ to return to Redmond.

Facing an existential crisis, Microsoft is making radical changes. Windows and Office “have clearly undergone some sort of genetic re-engineering,” he says.

In a lightly veiled swipe at Google, he added: “Most big competitors don’t want the disruption. When you make your money on the status quo, you are incented to move slow or not at all.”

Microsoft can’t afford to move slow. It knows that in five years, the PC won’t be what it is today.

Your office desktop will probably still have a monitor, a mouse and a keyboard, but those are just accessories. As mobile devices get better and faster, they’re taking over more of our computing tasks. Soon, a smartphone — or a tablet — could be your central device. Plug it into your desktop dock in the morning, then take it with you at night, and you’ll have have an extremely portable, all-in-one computer.

That’s the world for which Microsoft is building Windows 8. It can run everything from a touchscreen app like Angry Birds to resource-intensive software such as 3-D games and video editing tools. That sounds simple, but it’s an all-in-one approach Microsoft’s rivals have chosen not to pursue.

Microsoft’s long game

Windows 8 probably won’t be an instant hit. It’s a dramatic change, and corporate IT departments — Windows’ biggest customer base — are slow to shift directions.

That’s OK with Microsoft. It’s prepared to play the long game, devoting years — and, often, billions of dollars — to cracking the markets it considers critical.

That’s why it was willing to lose money for so long on Xbox, which recently became the world’s leading game system. That’s also why it is willing to plow billions each year into Bing, which remains a financial black hole.

“We’re a company that has extraordinary patience,” says Microsoft’s Beilinson.

Patience is great, but execution is critical. Microsoft’s mobile track record is littered with some spectacular failures — like Windows CE, the mobile operating system designed to look and function like Windows on the desktop. Sound familiar?

There’s signs Microsoft has finally learned from its previous catastrophes. Its “consumer preview” version of Windows 8 is drawing cautiously optimistic reviews.

Cnet reviewer Seth Rosenblatt calls it “the most ambitious operating system ever,” with a “speed and responsiveness” that Windows has never had before. Gizmodo deemed it a “daring” and “brilliant,” while The Telegraph says it’s Microsoft’s “most radical release in a generation.”

All the reviewers point out a key question mark hanging over Windows 8: Developer support. The platform will only take off if software makers embrace it as a legitimate third player in the Apple-and-Google field.

That’s why Microsoft is throwing everything it has into creating a new ecosystem. It can’t afford to be wrong.  To top of page

April 18, 2012 Posted by | Breaking News Headlines, Everything Internet, Investment News, Latest U.S. News, Latest World News, Science and Technology | , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment

World Banks announces new president Jim Yong Kong

Kim named World Bank president

By James O’Toole

Jim Yong Kim was tapped Monday by the World Bank to be its next president, besting Nigerian finance minister Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala following what was the first-ever challenge to the U.S. nominee in the institution's history.Jim Yong Kim was born in South Korea and grew up in Muscatine, Iowa, after emigrating to the U.S. as a child.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) — American Jim Yong Kim was tapped Monday to be the next president of the World Bank, besting Nigerian finance minister Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala following the first-ever challenge to the U.S. nominee in the institution’s history.

The bank’s board of directors said the multiple candidacies ”enriched the discussion of the role of the President and of the World Bank Group’s future direction.”

Kim’s victory was widely expected, given the voting structure of the bank.

Throughout its more-than-60-year history, the bank has been led by an American, part of a tacit agreement between the United States and its Western European allies. Europe, in turn, has maintained control of the International Monetary Fund.

The United States and Europe together have roughly 50% of voting shares, which are based on money paid into the bank.

But the challenges from Okonjo-Iweala and former Colombian finance head Jose Antonio Ocampo — who withdrew from the race last week and endorsed the Nigerian – raised questions about how much longer the current leadership arrangement will remain tenable.

World Bank: China’s economy in ‘soft landing’

In 2010, the United States and other World Bank shareholder-countries pledged support for an “open, merit-based and transparent” selection process. Such declarations have been met with cynicism by emerging market nations, however.

In a statement last week withdrawing his candidacy, Ocampo said the selection process was “shifting from a strict merit-based competition … into a more political-oriented exercise.”

Kim drew criticism following his nomination from some observers who said his lack of financial background made him ill-suited to run the bank. The institution, created in 1944, provides billions of dollars worth of financial assistance for projects worldwide ranging from health to education to private-sector development.

In contrast to previous heads of the institution, who have typically come from the economics or business worlds, Kim is a doctor who built his reputation developing public health programs for poor countries.

He’s currently the president of Dartmouth University, having previously worked at the World Health Organization and co-founded the non-profit organization Partners In Health.

Okonjo-Iweala, by contrast, is an economist with degrees from Harvard and MIT who logged more than two decades at the World Bank, eventually rising to the No. 2 position.

Earlier this month, a group of 39 former senior officials at the World Bank endorsed her in an open letter to the bank’s board, saying the American monopoly on the presidency “no longer reflect[s] the world as it is today.”

In an interview with CNN’s Christiane Amanpour that will be broadcast at 5PM EDT, Okonjo-Iweala congratulated Kim and said she was pleased with what she had accomplished in her campaign.

“We’ve been able to push this process along, and we hope that going forward, we’ll get an even more open, transparent and merit-based process,” she said.

“It should not be about the nationality of individuals, but about merit.”

Kim, who was born in South Korea before emigrating to the U.S. at age five, has won support from those who believe the bank should focus its energy on poverty reduction in the world’s poorest countries.

“As President, I will seek a new alignment of the World Bank Group with a rapidly changing world,” Kim said in a statement Monday, pledging to amplify “the voices of developing countries.”

In announcing Kim’s nomination last month, President Obama called the bank “one of the most powerful tools we have to reduce poverty and raise standards of living.”

“It’s time for a development professional to lead the world’s largest development agency,” Obama said.

The presidency became available when Robert Zoellick, a former deputy secretary of state who also served as international vice chairman at Goldman Sachs (GS, Fortune 500), announced that he would depart when his term concludes in June.

World Bank warns on global recession risk

Going forward, it appears the world’s emerging economies intend to make competition for the top jobs at the bank and the IMF a regular occurrence.

Following the resignation of IMF managing director Dominique Strauss-Kahn last year, the so-called BRICS countries — Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa — issued a joint statement calling Europe’s leadership of the institution an “obsolete, unwritten convention.” Mexican central bank chief Agustin Carstens challenged for the job, but another French leader, Christine Lagarde, ultimately succeeded Strauss-Kahn.

April 16, 2012 Posted by | Breaking News Headlines, Economic News, Everything Internet, Investment News, Latest U.S. News, Latest World News, Political | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment

Yahoo schedules 2000 employee lay-off

Yahoo cuts 2,000 jobs as radical reshaping begins

  • yahoo layoffs

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) — Yahoo said Wednesday that it will eliminate 2,000 employees, around 14% of its workforce, as new CEO Scott Thompson begins radically streamlining the company.

The long-rumored job cuts could be the first of several rounds, as Thompson pares Yahoo (YHOO, Fortune 500) down to focus on what he views as the company’s core business lines.

Thompson, who joined Yahoo in January, plans to provide more information about his strategy during the company’s first-quarter earnings announcement, which is scheduled for April 17.

In a written statement, Thompson said the cuts “are an important next step toward a bold, new Yahoo — smaller, nimbler, more profitable and better equipped to innovate. Our goal is to get back to our core purpose — putting our users and advertisers first.”

Yahoo said its job cuts will save the company $375 million a year when they are completed. It expects to take a $125 million to $145 million charge this quarter for severance costs.

Thompson is aiming to do something his recent predecessors — including Carol Bartz, who was forced out in September – have repeatedly failed to do: articulate a vision of what Yahoo is.

The Internet’s first giant portal has retained a massive user base, but has lost its edge in nearly every field to newer, nimbler rivals. The company gave up on search in 2009, and it’s losing ground in display advertising to new entrants to the market such as Google (GOOG, Fortune 500) and Facebook.

Thompson’s busy 2012: Wednesday’s layoffs come three months to the day that Thompson took over at Yahoo — and his tenure has already been a busy one. In February, four longtime board members, including chairman Roy Bostock, announced they would not seek re-election.

Exactly one week after that, activist shareholder Daniel Loeb and his hedge fund Third Point launched a proxy fight. Third Point, which owns a 5.56% stake in Yahoo, is proposing four new Yahoo board members, including Loeb himself.

Mere weeks later, in March, Yahoo filed a lawsuit against Facebook. The high-profile suit alleges that Facebook infringed on 10 of Yahoo’s patents related to advertising, privacy, customization, messaging and social networking.

Facebook called the lawsuit “puzzling,” while outside critics decried the move as “pathetic” and “desperate.”

Still, considering that his predecessors failed at fixing Yahoo, Thompson clearly knows he has to make bold moves. Whether they’re enough for the long-promised but so far elusive Yahoo turnaround remains to be seen

April 4, 2012 Posted by | Breaking News Headlines, Economic News, Everything Internet, Investment News, Latest U.S. News, Latest World News, Oil and Gas News, Political | , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment

How to prevent your credit form hackers

Global Payments credit card hack: What do I do?

By Julianne Pepitone @CNNMoneyTech

credit-cards-2.jc.top.jpg

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) — A credit card hack attack on Global Payments is hitting the headlines. Here are answers to some of the key questions it raises.

What happened in the Global Payments breach?

Global Payments, a company that processes card transactions, discovered an unauthorized intrusion into its servers in early March. The company says it “promptly” notified others in the industry. It didn’tpublicly announce the breach until Friday.

The breach affects all major credit and debit card brands, because Global Payments is one link in the long chain involved in card transactions.

When a customer swipes a credit card, the data is sent to a payment processor like Global Payments, which coordinates the steps involved in authorizing the charge and submitting the transaction details to card networks like Visa (V, Fortune 500) and MasterCard (MA, Fortune 500). It’s a quick but complicated process, with lots of players in the mix.

What kind of information was stolen? What can the hackers do with it?

Global Payments (GPN) released a statement late Sunday saying thataround 1.5 million card numbers may have been compromised. That’s a big breach, but the odds are good that your card wasn’t among them. There are more than 1 billion credit and debit cards currently in circulation in the U.S., according to the Nilson Report, an industry trade publication.

Card numbers were stolen, but that’s all the thieves got. Cardholder names, addresses and Social Security numbers were not affected, according to Global Payments.

That’s good news. Stolen numbers can be used create to fraudulent cards, but they’re not enough for full-fledged identity theft.

Global Payments is still investigating how the breach happened. The U.S. Secret Service has launched its own inquiry.

What does this mean for me? Should I be worried?

While the threat of a compromised card is upsetting, customers should sit tight. If your card issuer thinks your account may have been compromised, they’ll contact you. Some may need to reissue credit cards or take other steps to contain the damage.

No matter what, you’re not liable for unauthorized charges made on your account.

As Visa (V, Fortune 500) put it in a response to the Global Payments debacle: “It’s important for U.S. Visa consumer cardholders to know they are protected against fraudulent purchases with Visa’s zero liability fraud protection policy, which exceeds federal safeguards. As always, Visa encourages cardholders to regularly monitor their accounts and to notify their issuing financial institution promptly of any unusual activity.” To top of page

April 2, 2012 Posted by | Breaking News Headlines, Economic News, Everything Internet, Investment News, Latest U.S. News, Political, Verified Consumer Reviews | , , , , | Leave a Comment

Bad rep for Strauss-Kahn

Strauss-Kahn: A reputation battered by sex allegations

By Simon Rushton, CNN

Click to play
More legal woes for Strauss-Kahn
(CNN) – Former International Monetary Fund (IMF) chief and political contender Dominique Strauss-Kahn has seen his reputation tarnished in a turbulent 12 months.

He was once most known for his brilliant grasp of global economics and European politics.

Now, his name is connected with an accusation of sexual assault from a hotel maid in New York and an investigation into “aggravated pimping” in France by prosecutors who allege he participated in a prostitution ring.

Just last year, Dominique Gaston Andre Strauss-Kahn was head of the powerful IMF and the presumptive front-runner for the presidency of France.

But when a hotel employee accused him of assaulting her in Manhattan’s Sofitel Hotel last May his professional life disintegrated.

Despite denying the charges, he stepped down from the IMF and his dream of leading France’s Socialist Party in a presidential election, against Nicolas Sarkozy this year, vanished.

However, the criminal case against him fell apart before it reached a courtroom when New York prosecutors cited credibility issues with the maid’s story. Strauss-Kahn still faces a civil suit in the case.

Strauss-Kahn protest in Cambridge

Prostitution ring case turns to DSK

It was, by any standard, a stunning fall for the man many presumed would be the next occupant of the Elysee Palace.

It was also a cautionary tale for those who might forget how quickly sexual allegations can bring down even the most influential leaders.

Long before he ended up on the front pages of the tabloids, Strauss-Kahn was well known to followers of global financial news. The University of Paris-educated economist headed the IMF for the duration of the global financial crisis. In doing so, he played a lead role in arranging bailouts for Greece and Ireland, as well as propping up Europe’s single currency, the euro.

The IMF, which, among other things, assists countries suffering economic difficulties by providing loans, was founded near the end of World War II and is now made up of 187 countries.

Strauss-Kahn has been a force in French politics for a quarter-century, first winning election to that country’s National Assembly — the lower house of parliament — in 1986. He was President Francois Mitterrand’s trade minister from 1991 to 1993, and went on to serve as finance minister in the late 1990s. During that period, Paris joined the euro and ditched the franc.

In 1999, after an allegation of unethical financial doings involving his consulting business, Strauss-Kahn resigned his ministerial post. He was later acquitted of the charges.

Strauss-Kahn lost a fight with Segolene Royal for the Socialist Party’s presidential nomination in 2006. One year later, he was named managing director of the IMF.

Married to his third wife and the father of four children, he has also taught economics at Stanford University in California and at the prestigious Institut d’Etudes Politiques de Paris, known as Sciences Po.

A dominant figure on the French left, Strauss-Kahn also gained a reputation over the years as someone who enjoys a lavish lifestyle — critics have made much of his image as a “champagne socialist.”

As head of the IMF, Strauss-Kahn pulled in an annual tax-free salary of more than $420,000, according to a 2007 statement from the organization. He also received more than $75,000 for “a scale of living appropriate” to his position. To the extent that there was a perceived conflict between his socialist political ideals and wealthy lifestyle, it wasn’t an issue for most French voters, said Simon Serfaty, a senior European analyst at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington think tank.

Similarly, French voters typically take little notice of allegations of infidelility, which are much less likely to derail a political career in France than in America – though in Strauss-Kahn’s case, the sheer volume of accusations seems to have stymied his ambitions, for now at least.

Strauss-Kahn became embroiled in sexual controversy soon after joining the IMF in 2007: In 2008, he was reprimanded for having a relationship with a female employee.

An independent inquiry found the relationship was consensual, and the IMF’s executive board concluded that “there was no harassment, favoritism or any other abuse of authority by the managing director,” but it found that “the incident was regrettable and reflected a serious error of judgment.”

Strauss-Kahn issued a statement after the investigation, noting that he had “apologized for it to the (board of directors), to the staff of the IMF and to my family,” as well as to the employee.

In the months following the Sofitel Hotel accusation last year, other allegations surfaced. Anne Mansouret, a Socialist member of the French parliament, said Strauss-Kahn had attacked her daughter. Mansouret said she had cautioned her daughter, Tristane Banon, not to file a police report at the time, saying it might adversely impact her career.

Last year, Banon did file a complaint, alleging a 2002 attack, though it could not be pursued because the statute of limitations had expired.

Strauss-Kahn denied the allegations and has since filed a counter-suit in France, alleging slander. CNN does not typically name assault victims, but Mansouret said her daughter gave permission for her name to be disclosed.

Now Strauss-Kahn faces another legal battle — this time the case centers on an investigation into a high-profile prostitution network operating out of luxury hotels in the French city of Lille.

Strauss-Kahn has been formally warned that he is under investigation for “aggravated pimping,” and has been released on 100,000 euro bail.

When the latest claims surfaced, in November last year, Strauss-Kahn’s attorneys condemned the allegations as “unhealthy, sensationalist and not without a political agenda.”

His lawyer, Henri Leclerc, acknowledged in an interview with radio station Europe1 that Strauss-Kahn attended sex parties, but says his client was unaware that the women involved were prostitutes.

Strauss-Kahn is not allowed to have contact with other people involved in the investigation, nor is he permitted to talk to the media about the case.

April 2, 2012 Posted by | Breaking News Headlines, Economic News, Everything Internet, Investment News, Latest U.S. News, Latest World News | , , , , | Leave a Comment